|
Swami Vivekanda criticize Shankara
by Vaj on Mar 07, 2007 04:34 PM
The Acharya could not adduce any proof from the Vedas to the effect that the
Shudras should not study the Vedas. He only quotes Yagnenavaklupath (Tai
Samhita, VII, i.1.6) to maintain that when he is not entitled to perform Yagna he has
neither any right to study the Upanishads and the like. But the same Acharya
contends with reference to Atho to Brahma gignasa (Vadanta -sutra 1.i.1) that the
word Atha here does not mean subsequent to the study of the Vedas because it is
contrary to the proof that the study of the Upanishads is not permissible without the
previous study of the Vedic Mantras and the Brahmans and because there is
nointrinsic sequence between the Vedic Karma-kanda and Vedic Jnan Kanda. (From
Swami Vivekananda The Complete work: Vol VI pp2OS-1O, 1986).
In Ramayana, a True Reading, the author confirms that evenSwami Vivekananda and
Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru have stated unambiguously that the Ramayana is a myth
depicting the lifelong struggle between the ancient Aryans (Brahmins) and Dravidians
(the original Indians) Finally the Dravidians (the lndias original sons of soil) were
defeated by the Brahmins and Dravidians have become Shudras (low cast) and ended
with lifelong slavery!
Only those who are born in India will have this CURSE. Is there any other part of the
world which have this evil of slavery. They why alone in India this practice?
Only those who are born in India will have this CURSE. Is thereby any other part of the
world which have this evil of slavery. They why alone in India this practice?
Why dont we call His Holiness Shankaracharya as MAHATHMA Shankaracharyas
remark wont bother either Christians and Muslims. It is only for the 80% low caste
people other than Brahmins)
Forward | Report abuse
|
|
|
|
|
