The Only problem with India and Indian politicians is their obsession with secularism. In India secularism means being anti-Hindu and being pro-muslim. This is what most of the non-rss related politicians think. I have seen the awakening in most of my friends that i have spoken to. I just want to see what the BJP does if it attains a full maj in itself. Cong is an oppurtunist party. There ideology changes with time and place of elections. Their main motive is to attain power.
Now coming to Aurangzeb Road and The hindu-muslim arguments over history. May be No muslim will beleive that Aurangzeb was a villian and no Hindu will beleive him to be a Hero. But this has been well documented in India that he was a cruel ruler. That's y there were so many rebellions against him namely the Sikhs, Marathas, Satnamis etc. He inherited a great kingdom built so laborously by Akbar. The greatest mughal of the dynasty. Had aurangzeb been a good ruler there would not have been so many rebellions against him. Which ultimately lead to the decline of the mughal empire after his death. Now this should be difficult to refute by any muslim. How good can a person be who imprisons his own father, poisons his brother Murad who helped him win against Dara Shikoh can be well understood. Any ruler is a good ruler if he has been good to all his subjects No matter which religion he belongs to. He might have adhered strongly to the principles of Islam and enforced these principles in his kingdom But then by doing so he never did any good to his majority of subjects. Any govt today is a bad govt that treats badly the people who are in minority, And aurangzeb was very bad to majority of his subjects. This assumes signficance because almost all the revolts during his reign were from hindus. Except marathas all the revolts had sense of revenge for the atrocities commited on their religion and belief. His religious policy of intolerence was the main factor that a son of his revolted against him.
Anyway my giving all these facts is to challenge and present the muslims present here to refute my facts with facts.
And again concluding. As soon as the govt stops its obsession with muslim appeasment, There will not be any AurangZeb Road, And no Aurangabad. But The good muslim rulers should always be respected. Because there rule was truly secular, the only muslim angle being that they were muslim ex. Akbar the great, Tipu Sultan(was a temple just 100 metres away from his palace). I have always thought an award should be given to anybody who works for secularism in true sense, Not minorty appeasement. That award should be named as Akbar award.
I would just like to get good and matured responses. thank you.
