Francoise Gautiere have been spamming the site with cut-paste articles which sing praises of auranzeb, most of these have been written by pro-muslim western or pseudo-secular/marxist indian historians, most of whom did not live in the days of aurangzeb,these historians have no idea of the tyranny and misery under which hindus , sikh , buddhist and jains had to live in those days. we also can cut-paste articles from western articles who portray aurangzeb as evil,but obviously muslims will not believe in them, they refer to western historians only when it suits them.
2.While its true that aurangzeb had many hindu generals, that was because he was cunning and one of the earliest proponents of 'Divide and rule' policy.he hired them purely for political goals and not because he loved hindus.besides many of these hindu generals were hereditory servants of mughals,their grandfathers having served akbar and shahjahan. aurangzeb had very little trust on his hindu generals, he poisoned to death his commander-in-chief Mirza Raje Jaisingh and when Jaswant singh died,he invaded his kingdom and destroyed all the temples there. Many smaller hindu kings served him purely out of fear of being invaded. Many others served him to settle scores against rival hindu kings. many others served him to get mansabdari. this switchover of loyaly was very common in those days's especially among some rajputs and maratha's for example when Sambhaji Maharaj insulted his br
