Reply to Mr. Mohammed Ahmed on Mar 22, 2007 04:50 PM [REALLY GOOD POINTS TO DISCUSS NOW]
Dear Mr. Mohammed Ahmed
As per the information available with me, earlier also I had posted against your message, may be your posting seemed to little logical. With due apology I would mentioned that few of messages Muslim brothers, so fanatic, I really do not the reason, but again I do not have intention to malign anyone or so. I have read many message and it is absolutely impossible for me get those authenticated and since I am not fundamentalist, I am reasonably well read (as my friends tell, including Muslim friends) so I do not carry any blind faith to any belief, especially if it is controversial. I read many message and admire the readers have taken lots of pain to collect all those. Some people of written for and against Hinduism, another person has challenged he is the only person who has reproduced all the details from Quran and Hadith, and challenged if anyone has the guts to oppose it. These are endless discussion may have their importance, but the point I had raised, for these one need to go for any research.
Now I come to your points. I am fully aware about the difference between Personal and Criminal. I have never tried to synonym each other. What I have tried to explain is the exploitation of Personal Law for gain of individual or a community. Yes, our society is heterogeneous, which is very common and quite obvious in liberal, tolerant and modern society, which this (Indian) society is. If we go back couple of centuries ago, though the question of modernity would not arise, but Indian (unfortunately people of vested interested call it as Hindu) society were tolerant. All these vested interest has brainwashed that Muslim culture means Arab culture, to create a division among the Indian people, so that a particular segment could be used as slave (or vote bank). Not only this, such division suits the religious leaders also by which they gain name, fame, money, power etc. etc. and lots of followers, disciples etc. etc. that too without acquiring any skill in themselves. You, yourself contradicted that by using the word keeping unite and different personal law. You have tried to club Personal Law and Customs together. Gentleman, Customs are Personal Laws could be legitimise upto an extent till it does not affect the homogenous society, till it is not part of the constitution, till it is not part of country%u2019s law and till it leaves no opportunity where any dispute could arise about the supremacy over the country%u2019s law applicable for all the citizen. A Personal Law, if at all is applicable, it must not be parallel to country%u2019s Law and in case of any dispute the country%u2019s law applicable for all the citizen should be binding and final for all. Now you imagine, if tomorrow some other community say Hindu demands for Personal Law, what the result would and not only this as to why in secular country the rights of all the people should be same and should be govern by homogenous law, of course Custom is different matter, but again in case of dispute, it must be sorted out through the law of land only and not by any religious or community leaders. In all the developed countries, there is no such personal law for any particular community and what you wanted to portray that religion is above and must for political and social stability. Though I do not blame, but I strongly feel that your opinion is based on the brainwashed thinking that religion is supreme than country and society. So far the unity of country it is based on the patriotism and not on religion, otherwise all the Muslim dominated countries should have been a single country.
So far your claim that the small communities should be given political importance, I do agree but do not agree for exploitation. Apart from this Muslim country is not the smallest minority rather they are majority among the minorities and this is the reason they are being used as vote bank. One of the smallest minority is Paarsi community and I personally salute them for their contribution towards our motherland is phenomenal and never come and should for political importance or so, otherwise also our constitution provides ample scope for the safeguard of minorities interest and I also agree that there should be safeguard but in the name of minority the exploitation is a crime. You can never justify like Godhra Train incident is act of minorities, of course the aftermath was horrible, and we must avoid such incidence at any cost. I have very clearly defined about MAJORITY and MINORITY and there should not be any classification of majority and minority on the basis of religion.
My dear brother, terrorism can never prosper without local support, now you have of identify and come forward, who are directly involved, who provide support services, like shelter, local network, logistics etc. etc. You are the right person who could bust these
Muslim community is absolutely not marginalized, they are the majority among minorities and otherwise also no other community gets such privilege, even not the smallest one like Parsis. The practice of religion is very individual matters and why a particular segment should be allowed to enjoy the taxpayer%u2019s money. Taxpayer%u2019s money is for society and for all, and absolutely not for particular community and too for few people who goes for Haz. Can you reply me in case the religious Majority claim the same facility, what would be burden to country and who would pay. My dear brother, be logical, one can feed a person as per my wish based on humanism but how one can allow to be robbed himself. You have taught a lesson that vote according to your own narrow interest, imaging if the religious majority also start thinking like this, what would be situation of religious minorities. I indeed shocked to know your opinion about democracy, let the majority start think through your angle. Probably mine is last generation where people are liberal, I horrify when think about our coming generation.
