1. India is not yet secular because it appeases Muslims. There is difference between rituals and culture. Saath phere and cremation are rituals. Marrying 4 wives is Muslim culture. Why not debate polygamy against monogamy and fix it? Hindus and Christians have fixed things, why cant Muslims? 2. Did wikipedia give any wrong info on that case?? If it did then you go and research in that case and produce a point of good that happened in that case. Although for your info May 1986, the government introduced and got passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Bill, which effectively closed to Muslim women the option of obtaining relief under Section 125 of CrPC. Whereas the Supreme Court had found a way to help a hapless individual in straitened circumstances, the Indian Parliament proceeded first to enclose her within a monolithic group identity, then raised that group identity so as to make it the sole determinant of the issue in her case. The Indian law-makers did so in the name of protecting the group rights of a religious minority, the Muslims. Why dont you get the point the women of Muslim religion are being affected by this? 3. Proof is scattered all around and got from excavations. Govt is just appeasing Muslims. What better proof you want in Kashi and Mathura where you see that the mosque is attached to the temple and built over it. Why not return them atleast? If Muslims dont want to give these temples, they dont have right to ask for anything from Israel. 4. Still you dont get it and ask me what kind of open debate...pitty...its not debate with me...but debate in your community openly, with no fatwa threat. If my knowledge is half, why dont you give me full knowledge or you just want to hide your darkness under calling me illogical and half knowledge?
