Why are you so reluctant to accept the atrocities of Aurangzeb, just because he was a Muslim? This is called fundamentalism and the writer is not a Hindu fundamentalist. Why the secular Muslims in India like you have not protested against the proposed Sharia rule in Kashmir? Is it not against the secularism in a state of secular India? Its time that people like you change your mentality and come out of the clutches of religion. Religion is supposed to be a faith, which should make us be a more refined human being, and not facsism and wiping out histrory and it is not able the nation. Actually the minority appeasement started by the Congress has become so strong due to political vote bank game, anything said against somebody who is related to Islam is protested and termed as Hindu fundamentalism. What is going on in Kashmir? Why should we term the exhibition on Aurangzeb as controversial just because that demon, the enemy of human happened to be a Muslim and that hurts you. Try to accpet the fact, the history. If you are a true Muslim, have shame on Aurangzeb because he was a Muslim. Dont try to fall in trap of the pseudo secularists like Congressi and the hypocritical Marxsists. Enough of maligning and neglecting the sentiments of the majority Hindus in India. We are rising - we are not intolerant like majority Muslims like you, we have the guts to accept our past and move forward.
