My dear Mr. Radhakrishna Iyer, why should our secular Government not allow us to follow the Hindu civil rules of Manu, where a man can marry "n" number of time. This will not be affecting other communities.
Killing Aurangzeb's brothers were not related to Hinduism but for throne but we cannot ignore the fact that the religious tolerance started by Akbar, which continued till Shah Jahan was carry forwarded by Dara also. The comparison with Kashmir is very much apt because like Aurangzeb, the Muslim fundamentalist who clensed out Hindus, the same thing was being done with the Kashmiri pandits and now full fledged Ismalisation of a state of democratic and secular India is on process and so called secular people are feeling very happy. can you tell me why subsidy is given on Hadge while a pilgrimage to Amarnath is taxed? Can you tell me why a marxist minister Subhash Chakravorty was show caused by the leadership beause of his worshipping mata Kali in a temple?Ok the marxists do not belive in God. Then why a Muslim leader in CPM is never questioned for going to a mosque? Boss - its plain hypocricy. Minorities are pampered just for vote at the cost of any and every ideology. This is done by all Congress and their fellow minded politicians. why cant every body be equal? No special rules for any body - no special preferntial treatment for anybody? Look at the democracy of European countries. They dont have separate outlooks for their fellow citizens based on religion and caste. Please dont be a pseudo secularist.
