to everybody, History is something which we accept what we read. But fact can be known from people who really suffered. whosoever thinks that Auranbzeb is great because he was not spending any mony from government for personal use and that makes him great should visit india especially maharashtra for seeing his cruel dids because of which india is still facing social disturbance. If somebody feels Aurang zeb was good I really feel pity for them that they are misguided. After partition it happens and its quite natural that countries like pakistan they will teach history which will promote that every islamic ruler of india was good because islam is basis of formation of pakistan and they try to look down upon hindu kings. That is happening with some guys like farrukh nadeem who might have read that kind of stuff. He has no right to compare shivaji the manner he compared him with Aurangzeb. In india there are lot of muslims who have great respect for Shivaji (and equal hate for Aurangzeb) for his secular stance and his freedom struggle. So what i want to say to everybody is please dont comment anything untill you achieve that so called impartial thiking which is quite difficult to have for anybody including me because all of us are influenced by social things surrounding us.
