Thanks off side for taking the time out to reflect on my post! I respect his education and his analysis. I have been reading his columns for a long time. But these conclusions he is giving seem too fantastic considering the time line! Granted he has back channel access and his own contacts to feed him but before the Pakis can give a formal statement (which will be lies anyway), does Raman need to point to three different entites that were never previously on the radar?
