This is one of the best analytical articles I have read so far. (You have my sympathy. You should read a bit more.) The Congress and communist hypocrites have always been against Hindus. (Really, now : since only a few congressmen relatively are non-Hindus. Do we take it that certain Hindus are anti-Hindu ?) Yet so many foolish Hindus have been supporting these two pseudo-secular parties. (It seems the thought expressed is that a very large number of Hindus are foolish enough to do that.) Now under a Christian foreigner, the anti-Hindu conspiracy has sought to widen the divide between castes and communities. (After a person is granted citizenship, he or she remains a foreigner, is it ?) Why should there be separate laws in a secular state? (Because that was what the Constitution the people gave themselves states. Why is it so difficult for a %u201Ctolerant%u201D community of Indian people to tolerate another community of Indian people living according to their laws ?) Why not have a common civil code, so that there is no differentiation between people of different communities ? (Uniform Civil Code : any formats yet ? Consensus ? What does a Civil Code do : change people%u2019s thinking ? Which parts of what laws will prevail and form part of such a code ? Have you discussed the details with your own co-religionists in various parts of the country ? Would you like to try that before finding it impracticable and unacceptable to the vast majority of Hindus themse
