My dear friend-a great analyses made ,but the message flowing in from most parts of article convey-lopsided state of thoght process.It looks journalistic and short of vision,not beyond plethora of common words like Secularism and high sounding terms.It is to solicit your attention to read in between the lines of Indian Democracy.An effort seems being made,but often driven to popular conclusions.Indian democracy is hardly a party driven,but individuals who are able to manage or manipulate call the shots and wrest power.Tug of war in parties,bureaucrats,ideologies always remained symbolic.Statisticians,Poll masters and analysts have repeatedly missed to count on individual`s capability to garner and win as against party and ideology.The key result areas- like performance,etc as rightly given in the article wlll surely make difference in times to come.Intensity of factors governing the mindset varies with time.Fundamentalism or nofundamentalism cannot drive all the times-This is well learnt.So there is no fear on that account.At the same time-a balanced set of democratic practices kept Congress in power for a long time.When they apprehended,loosing their grip,they lost balance.And made most mistakes.Public at large is becoming mature.Politicians for power are surely making them intelligent and lncreasing literacy will further enrich the system.Bogey of Secularism,Communalism or communism or Hinduism or Islam or Christianity can not stay,because weare all turning wise. Action i
