1. An act of violence is heinous: no matter who does it- hindu or muslim: why dont muslims and other pseudo secular people treat them as same. A muslim killed is a catastrophe but a hindu killed is nothing? why? just because they are majority? why this double standard? 2. the author mentions that there were no 'major' arms haul: ok so you agree there have been arms recovery in the past? can he come forward and explain what prompted the good citizens of so called' mini pakistan' to keep deadly weapons in their home? if laws like TADA are applied to them then it is atrocity - why ?are they above law? 3. who gave muslims a right to think they can be a separete state within the state of India: they have every right to keep their religius identity, but why do they need damn stupid maulvis to tell them what to do? cant they think of themselves? 4. is there any reason that the author can give for the generic indifference of muslims to education? even if I take gujrat out of the discussion? why are they so opposed to embracing the realities of life? 5 last thing: as long as muslims owe their loyalty and alligience to a foreign land, they will have trouble being accepted by any society. Just because your faith was originated in gulf, why give religion precence over your homeland? just see how happy many muslims are when pakistan wins a match- all because they are more muslims? ridiculous!!
