Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
CONGRESS BEFORE 1977 IS NATIONALISTIC
by SURYAPRAKASH TATA on Dec 03, 2007 10:34 AM

DONT GET CONFUSED, CONGRESS THAT IS EXISTING TODAY IS NOT THE SAME OLD CONGRESS WHERE MAHATMA IS PART OF IT. FROM 1977 THE DAY OF EMERGENCY WAS IMPOSED, FOR THE FIRST TIME CONGRESS FELT THAT THERE IS OPPOSITION EXISTING IN INDIA TO THEM THEN THE SELFISHNESS OF THEN MRS. INDIARA FEROZ STARTED WHERE SHE BECAME A RAVANI(LADY RAVANA),FOR THE SAKE OF POWERE SHE KILLED HER OWN SON(SANJAY GANDHI) AS HE IS GROWING AS A LEADER FOR WHICH SHE IS NOT READY TO ACCEPT. THE ONLY PRIME MINISTER THAT CONGRESS HAS GIVEN WHO DID GOOD TO THE NATION AFTER NEHRU,PATEL,SASTRY AND CO IS PV NARASIMHA RAO WHOSE WORKS WERE PAYING US TODAY. SO CONGRESS A FAILED PARTY IN INDIA AS IT DID NOTHING EVEN AFTER RULINGFOR 50 YEARS IN 60 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE. 10 YEARS OF GOOD WORK PAYING THIS MUCH DIVIDENCE BY VAJPAYEE AND TEAM, SO IMAGIN HOW GOOD IT COULD BE IF HE RULES FOR ANOTHER 10 YEARS?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
BJP leader on Gujarat election