Look mr,you like to remain shrouded without revealing your identity and then you make convoluted statements like "you are twisting facts with logical assumptions".The truth is that what you temr as "logical assumptions" are REAL,HARD FACTS!And I used those facts to arrive at my surmise.In fact,the surmises are also not mine.Since I don't have the ready references to point at or provide link to (although I have studied each one of the reports myself thoroughly) I chose to conclude my communication as if they were my own surmises. Now what is your defence of the allegation you have made, viz, that I am "twisting the facts"? I am pretty certain, you go even more within your shroud now!!
