Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
who says what on Indian parliament?
by kum sad on Aug 23, 2007 11:48 PM

I was totally surprised by the observation that government of india can enter into any treaty with any country abrogating the peoples voice represented by the parliament.Even voting right and discussion in parliament had been gagged. Already the country is ruled by an extra constitutional center more in favor with countries outside india than people inside, and it has already created enemies out of friends and has made friends, enemies. The government of India has positioned itself as the friend of terrorist outfits,while the PM himself is loosing sleep thinking how to protect raw murderers executing premeditated murders in India as well as abroad.How can a government have more power than the parliament when it is only a creature of the parliament?If it has, then people has more power than the parliament and the government. Open revolution mutiny and death will be the result, not democracy. If the GOI makes any agreement with any body, the people of India will never loose their basic rights and power,and any agreement entered into such a government will be null and void, not binding to the people of india. Such agreements which affect the very basic rights of citizens cannot be ratified unless the whole text is made public,made open to debate,and then every citizen gets an opportunity to study,question or accept what has been made available to him,and gives a majority in a plebiscite. Otherwise the next government can and should abrogate all such agreements arrived against

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Amend Constitution for debate