This is why I feel this article is pretty much a long talk with short facts. I will go para wise and put the points as mentioned and connection to this case. 1st Para %u2013 Introduction. 2nd - Shenoy%u2019s opinion. 3rd %u2013 Again his personal opinion. 4rth %u2013 Just some rambling and some disparaging remarks. As if sensible people are allowed to carry AK-56. 5th %u2013 Mr. Shenoy seems to agree that judge did not convict him as a terrorist. Even though he seems to agree with a heavy heart. 6th %u2013 Good point, judgement after so long time seems to kill the meaning of reforming someone. But still nothing related to why sanjay should get more punishment. 7th %u2013 hmm, is he trying to say Sanjay was threatening Nikam? Totally unrelated and trying to mislead the gullible. 8th and 9th %u2013 Drink and drugs have nothing to do with this case in TADA court. Some people may stress out more if their mothers died when they were 20 than others and everyone might do something different. Unrelated though.. 10th %u2013 Yes, he was talking to Chota Shakeel, a mistake no doubt. They were old aquaintance. A few months punishment for this would suffice? 11th %u2013 Where is any one talking about Sanjay being a role model for youth? Actually he can be looked upon as an example of things not to do. 12th %u2013 Trying to bring in bombay blasts is misleading actually. He was not involved with that as per any investigation.
