it is strange that congress is trying to take credit for the rise of all successful muslims in the country. what has congress party done in particular for people like azim premji, sania etc. whose name they are mentioning in the booklet? since ours is a truely secular country, some people of all religions have progressed. even during NDA rule azim premzi and other names mentioned by the party in the booklet, had not been discriminated against. if the party has done so much for the muslims, why the PM from congress party is saying, based on sachar committee report that muslims can no longer be disciminated against, which means that muslims had been discriminated earlier. can the congress party tell what is the correct situation?
the booklet also mentions that by amending the constitution after sc's judgement in favour of shah bano they have favoured muslims. it is wrong. this amendment was appeasement of fundmental muslims and at the same time it was against women's right. congress party does not believe in the progress of anyone. it just wants progress of their own partymen, others like azim premji just happen to progress in the process. it is their selfishness and no commitment to any ideology, that in the absence of someone from the nehru dynasti they cannot remain united and they fight amongst themselves. for this reason this family has also got undeclared veto power no one in the party can ever criticise anyone from the family for any reason whatsoever. that is the reason rahul is saying whatever nonsence comes to his mouth. what the party does is that they try to appease fundamental elements from various religions (but mostly muslim) and castes as and when they think it suits them for electoral gains.
