Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Muslims - not a minority community, Judgment by High Court
by on Apr 06, 2007 10:12 AM

The Hon High court has given the judgment, and in minutes, Kapil Sibal. a union Minister, criticises the same. Being a senior advoocate, should he feel different, the system permits him to go on appeal,not to criticise the judge.
Is it not a fact that since 975 AD, when Md gazhni attacked India, (he attacked 18 times to plunder the Indian wealth), till 22-09-1857 , Delhi was ruled by Muslims. 1857, the first revolt against british started, and they decided to, by supporting Muslims not to agree anything said by Hindus, and sanctioned benefits . The best examople is the Nawab of Arcot. In India by a constitutional amendment we derecognised the Princes and benefits given to them were cancelled. But the Nawab of Arcot alone still carries the title. He was ruling a small territory, but was given lot of properties and money as gift. If one is prepared to see the document of the property owned by Nawab in triplicane, it says it is given by British as a gift for the services rendered to the British crown,what was the service, he was the man who signed papers giving powers to British to collect taxes. One should only see the Film, Kattabomman acted by Shivaji, and the small area ruler of Tirunelveli, says, if Nawab of arcot has given you the right to collect taxes from us, please go and ask him. It is well explained in History that Ettayyappan and Nawab of Arcot were British stooges. Muslims were favoured to oppose Hindus. That is why I say, a country which was ruled by Muslims from 975 to 1857, and then ruled by British till 1947 and then ruled by Congress, whose only aim is to pamper and appease muslimns.the moot question who made you backward, who denied benefits and rights? It is well explained in History that Aurangzeb, the most notorious muslim ruler enforced double tax on Hindus, denied Government jobs to Hindus, and Hindus out shear frustration to survive converted to Islam. A cursory glance of Indian History will reveal, the sufferings of Hindus under Muslim rule, like Thuklaq, Kiljis, and Aurangazeb.

The iorony is today, we respect Aurangazeb by naming an important raod in Delhi after him.Are you aware there no road in Delhi named after Mahathma Gandhi or Jawaharlal Nehru.But we have Humayun Marg, Aurangazeb Marg, Akbar Marg,Lodhi Colony, Shajahan Marg, and many more. No Shivaji marg?
In the Indian Banks, the highest deposits are held by Muslims. The averege income of a muslim family is double of a Hindu family. One should visit Malappuram, Cannanore, Calicut distrcts in Kerala to see the prosperity of Muslims. The highest sales glazed tiles in India is in Northern Kerala, which is an indicator of how theyare aquiring property & constructing palatial buildings.
Still they say they are backward. Backward in what. Who made you backward. Allaudin Kilji? Thuklaq? Babar?Shajahan? Aurangazeb? or lately Fakrudin Ali Mohamed? Zakir Hussien? Congress?
Because you vote as a block, crooked politicians are after you.

STOP NEWS. BCCI in the meeting today decided to have reservation in the Indian Cricket team for muslims.
Mulayum Singh Yadav and M Karunanidhi welcomed it. Y S Rajasekara Reddy demanded that it should be extended all sports.

Kannan Karamanai







    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Muslims not religious minority'