Prem Kumar, SC says that 1931 census data can't be taken into account for implementing reservations and that's why it has issued a stay. They never said not to implement them. No one talks about that and are out to conduct bandhs, effecting normal life and causing immense damage to the economy.
Don't you guys think SC has raised a valid point, if everyone stayed in the same backwardness category since 1931, what have the reservation policies since idependence achieved? If they failed to uplift people, then why to implement them.
Any level headed person would say that reservations should be given only to needy people and exclude creamy layer from the beneficiaries, so that the benefits would go to the needy.
But no one supports that idea, because majority of people who conduct these bandhs and do hulla gulla belong to creamy layer and they want to enjoy that benefit fro themselves and for their future generations at the expense of backward people in their own communities.
OBCs club themselves with SC & STs when they talk about reservations to put forward their point with greater force and garner larger support for their cause, but at other times they don't treat them as equals and are as worse as some of the FCs.
