Rajeev Srinivasan's particular brand of sectarian ideology on retreat on every front, and in every state of this blessed country, he is now reduced to repeating his much flogged divisive theories but in a much more incoherent manner. The article lacks unity and has no central idea. It cannot satisfiy even his regular fundementalist fans.
The lack of intellectual content in RS' wrtings was compensated by his fiery sectarianism and fundementalist convictions. They served the useful purpose of putting on record the sectarian point of view and the accompanying prejudices shared by many of his readers. These articles were a source for understainding the fundementalist mindset.
The present article is disappointing from this point of view...