Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Tibet was never Chinese
by Dipak Bose on Jan 24, 2008 04:16 PM

The British convened a tripartite conference to discuss Tibet's status at Simla in 1914. The Tibetans arrived at the conference with written evidence proving the historical independence of Tibet. The Chinese delegation, who were present only to witness the treaty between Britain and Tibet, argued that Tibet's subjugation by the Mongols and the Manchus proved it had become an integral part of China, and should therefore now be ruled as part of the new Republic of China of Sun Yat Sen from Peking.
However, Tibet was not really subjugated by the Mongols and Manchus but influenced by them. Neither Mongols nor Manchus were Chinese. In fact China itself was occupied for long by both the Mongols and the Manchus.

Using the same argument India can claim Burma, Malaysia, Singapore, HongKong as well.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Tibet is our territory: China