Though in legal spirits an accused should be given right to defend by a competent councilor, the councillor who has failed in the cases of public interests but has always defended the the accused in the cases of notority puts the question mark on the credibity of defence. Just because in this case big fees is involved as the accused belonged to so called celebruty catagory the case defence is accepted by a jurist of celebrity status? Let Mr.Malani question to his soul which picking up such clients.
