Accepted the point that a BC securing 65% marks against all odds is better than a UC with 90% marks with all the facilities. But then, the assumption you seem to be making is that all BCs are in rural India where there are no facilities and all UC people are in urban areas where all the facilities are available. Do you have a logic to support your argument if there is a UC who has secured 75% marks against all the odds that a BC has faced and is denied admission?
Guess, Indians should grow up. If the government wants to improve the socio-economic status of the country, the reservations should be based on the economic status of the person and not on the basis of caste. Caste is no indicator of who should be eligible for a reserved seat. Hope the politicians understand this and stop the divide and rule approach they are using.
