Also executive fails to file proper chargesheets and most of the time they either lack evidence or employ a lawyer who lacks knowledge about the case. We have seen that most of the culprits go scot free after all these dramas. I think judiciary should understand the importance of the culprit to be in India rather than egoistically assuming that executive has not given it due honor. History is evident that most of the cases are fought on the platform of ego. Was the judge in whose court the convict was produced had no information of conditions? Why did s/he raised this inappropriate question? I think this speaks of ego. All s/he was trying to say that how can executive take decision without consulting judiciary? May be (let us hope) s/he was demanding papers from executive. In that case it is fair , executive should have produced convict with papers of undertaking. Now, the job in front of judiciary is to look at the broader question of societal benefit than crying over non-executability of its judgement. An honest approach by both executive and judiciary will help India to throw mafiosi in Arabian sea . Death or no death for salem hardly matter.
