Well, so this is the face of "secular" India! . pakis claim a lot of things, including Kashmir, as their own. So, do we have to take their word as gospel? . If Indian muslims are indeed Indian, why did laloo have to mention paki certification to put his point across. After all, the chief allegation against muslims in India is that they are supporters of pakistan. So, why are muslims playing to these tunes if they want to prove themselves otherwise. Why didn't the large number of muslims present protest the use of such an argument? Why doesn't the author of this piece protest it either? Is it giving comfort to muslims that pakistan has verified laloo's credentials? Why didn't the secular giants like sonia protest it either?
