B. Raman starts off saying he is no admirer of Narendra Modi. But his whole article is aimed at saying that Modi's U.S. visa should not have been revoked by the U.S. Raman seems to have become Modi's spokesman and puppet. For him, the denial of a visa for Modi is an issue of national pride. The fact that thousands of Muslims were murdered while Modi deliberately did nothing does not count for anything. National pride should be based on justice and security to all, not the denial of a visa to a tainted politician. Why does rediff.com give so much space to rabid Hindu bigots like B. Raman whose only job it seems to be to downplay the deaths of innocent minority victims of riots. Raman and Modi have something in common: they offer nothing but hate and prejudice. Please rediff.com, get some balance in your columnists who seem to have an anti-secular, anti-Islam agenda like Raman? Cry, the beloved country, when columnists like Raman are given so much space to spew poison.
