As much as I agree with the arguement put forth by Mr.Modi refering to previous occasions when the US choce to give visa's to head of states where some sort of riots had occured under their regime, one thing I dont understand is why did Mr.Modi apply for a diplomatic visa when his visit had nothing to do with politics or diplomacy. If he already had a 10 year visa since 1998, he could have just used that and entered the US finished his trip and gone back. This controversy would never have raised. I wonder what Mr.Modi's explanation would be!!
