There were many lies and hidden truths in Colonel's article. If it is just a show of patriotism then I will give him 9 out of 10. For being a writer he deserves 7/10 and for being a logical person, I give him 4/10. (He still has got some logical points, altough being a typical 'fauji' he did not get them). I wonder why colonel did not mention Sicahin invasion by indian army, bangladesh's invasion by indian army, 1965's invasion by indian army ??? He cannot see through the glass!!! It was not indian army who got kargal hill back, it was Clinton who forced Nawaz Shareef for a withdrawl. Well it was not strength of pakistan's army that it was holding that area, it was just the stretegic position that was favoring pak army. India even used air-force to push pak army back (there was no pak air force involved still two indian fighters were down and pilots arrespted in pakistan). I suggest people of india to see pakistan's perspective before blindly going for some one's stories.
