saisuresh seems to have many confused thoughts and has tried hard to carry such confusion to the readers.He should have some basic knowledge of Dravidian movement (which is limited to Tamil Nadu). Only this movement has attempted to idolize Ravana, merely because: Ravana is supposedly a "Southerner" (he was King of Sri Lanka which has long ceased to be part of India, anyway). Rama was a "northerner" and on top of it an "aryan" and therefore for a Dravidian movement there is a pathological hatred against Rama. What is forgotten and surprising too, is that in this process this Dravidian Movement which has been attempting to idealise Ravana (only to spite the Northerners and the Believers) forgets conveniently that Ravana was also a Brahmin! How come then that this brahmin haters have turned to become a brahmin lover (only in the case of Ravana?). Reference to Valmiki as a thief is neither charitable nor apt. Valmiki had deeply repented this side of his earlier life and completely reformed himself by deep penance. Do you still call him a thief? Ridiculous.
Ravana is bad by action and his life, despite his devotion to Shiva. He used his powers for wrong things. So did Jinnah.
