Dear Mr.Raman,Its unfortunate to the core that we are still debating on the Advani affair.But the very fact that u have commented so pathetically on the incident that provokes me to write in defense of Advani.There are a number of occassions where u say Jinnah was unsecular, he was the man for partition even though Gandhi wanted to do away with his idea.If Jinnah is called unsecular,then the same tag should be given to Nehru and ultimately Gandhi for supporting Nehru.Why didnt Nehru accept Jinnah?Can we not say the same thing to Nehru for exploiting Gandhi and whole of India for he wanted to be the Prime Minister?Can we not say the same thing about Gandhi who allowed himself to be a sitting duck for Nehru and ultimately support him instead of Jinnah?If only majority of the Indian masses had something in between their ears that they would think.We Indians tend to make always a wrong decision.This is one more instant of it.There is also one more angle to it.Can u tolerate somebody from Pak who comes to India,visits Rajghat and says Gandhi as unsecular?No,correct?You guys always like them to be called secular/visionary/fighting for the cause etc etc.Same there in Pak.So Raman,GROW UP!
