Obviously you have not read the report that the Godhra tragedy was not a massacre as you proclaim but in all probability an accident. What followed after that was even more shameful as that was undoubtedly an outright massacre.
However, that was dismissed as "public outcry". The very same public that you believe is not responding appropriately to the upheavals in the Hindu religion was the public that killed thousands in the Godhra aftermath How come that doesn't find any mention in your article. Is that not worthy of tears?
And how in the world do you relate Hinn with Sonia Gandhi. This comment is more ludicrous than Uma Bharti saying that she had nothing to do with Babri.
Reading your article makes me wonder how half-baked journalists like yourself land up getting their biased opinions on websites like Rediff. I completely stand by freedom of speech but was the editor sleeping on the job.
