I find this article to be a very interesting story. Unfortunately it seems to be just that. There seem to be no defined facts in this article other than the fact that there was an attack at the Indian Institute of Science.
The person/persons who committed this heinous act in the Indian Institute of Science need to be punished, and justice needs to be delivered fast. But these days it seems to be the norm in the media to deliver stories without presenting any facts.
From this article, it seems that Osama Bin Laden's sleeper cells are active all over India. Certainly something which would create a lot of fear and panic amongst readers.
But are these facts? If a writer knows so much about these cells existing all over India, then shouldn't the police be interrogating the writer to find out more about such terror cells?
Journalists need to be more responsible about what they write. If the writer provides facts in the article, or reveals the sources of the information provided in the article, then everybody needs to stand up and applaud such writers.
