The author might be correct but the reality is unless muslims stand firm and fight and show firmly that islam is for peace, then only one can accept him. In the later part of the article the author coins his words very carefully to show the grievance of muslims taking chechanya, palestien etc. If he really were a broad minded muslim he would have opely codemened Kashmir where thousands of "Innocent", I repeat "Innocent" Hindus had deported, burnt alive, Hindu women raped. Not a word has been mentioned. Palestine could be a mulim cause but what about Kashmir? Its a integral part of India. Since he did not mention that(although being an indian) I phoo phoo his article as just another hipocracy.
