|
there is not good or bad terrorism
by Alex on Aug 31, 2005 12:16 AM
The article says "Many of the terrorists (not all), acting in the name of Islam"
Why does one feel the need to include the term "not all" if Islam is totally against "indiscriminate violence"
Is it because the author thinks that there are some forms of terrorism which are not indiscriminate??
There is nothing called good or bad terrorism. Terrorism of all kinds is bad, and should be condemmed FULLY.
Why does the Author shy away from doing the same.
Forward | Report abuse
|
|
|
|
|
