On reading this article I get the impression that the writer is an extremely fickle person incapable of coherent thought and has attempted to make a straight-forward issues as complex. While a person may have one way of looking at an issue like secularism anyone can grasp the essence of secular ideas. He himself has made such heavy weather about it and knows what it is not but CANNOT HIMSELF DEFINE it.
So what is the big idea in claiming people to be liars when he in his wisdom cannot set any benchmark or standard or image to show why he is right and seculars are liars. Or in other words muddy the water to obsure the issue - how brilliant.
Minority term and definition?? The man is overboard again if a simple issue where the earlier government in its inherent fundamental nature made those of other faiths in minor numbers fair game not just during their tenure but also in their majority ruled states. It is the cowardly who prey on the weak and therefore the mandate of all sensible people to stand up to these bigots. They do come in different hues and pursue different and hidden agendas but like all bad trees only put out inedible and bad fruit.
