First of all, the disputed structure was not a Masjid - it was not used for Muslim prayer since 1949. It was, for all practical purposes, a Hindu temple with an Islamic architecture. The Hindu claim to the site has been backed by solid evidence, and Hindus have a right to determine the architecture of their own temples, especially one with special significance for them like the Ram temple. The site has no special significance for Muslims. It is only the secularists who were up to their usual mischief, and convinced Muslims that giving up Babri was a grave threat to Islam.
Secondly, demolishing a building is in no way comparable to terrorism. Buildings don't have feelings and can't feel pain. There would be no need to state the obvious, but secularists tend to be thick-headed.
No, Advani is not a terrorist. No, Modi has not killed thousands of Muslims in Gujarat - one third of those who died in the riots were Hindus. And the riots were started by Muslims. Please visit gujaratriots.com for more.
Terrorists can indeed belong to any religion, but there is only one religion which expressly supports terrorism done in its name and the name of its God. I do not need to tell you which one it is.
