adithi..there are diffrent genres of cinema but they are not commercial, art etc etc. geners are sceince fiction, comedy, new wave, neo-realism etc etc. Films like arth, manthan were artistic and huge commercial hits which genre would you put them in? I would put 'Arth' in Drama and 'manthan' in neo-realism. when I said 'rea' i meant films in which the characters are real like for example sharukh in swades, satya in satya. I like RGV because he is good at it. for example the character of urmila is very real in 'rangila' when she is talking to her mom, brother and father and then all of a sudden she becomes a star during her dance performances or romantic scenes. Its very difficult but RGV can do that. I have problems with RGV because he has a taste for violence which is not good for the society. we dont need to see blood drops even if they are a reality. That way we are trivializing crime. I did not put farah khan in the category of 'real' cinema. she is good at larger-tahn-life drama and its fine as long as you dont call it art. I have problems with films like 'KANK' where you take up an issue like post marriage affair and trvialize it songs and fake endings. Either u take up a serious issue and deal ith seriousness or make an enteraining film. Same is with dil se. you make a film on north east problem where the protagonist is an AIR reporter who dances on the top of a train. or with Veer zara where you are dealing with a problem like foreign jail birds and you end up show
