its isnt about Raja writing reviews... its about how critic should approach... a topic...
first this movie doesnt depict history i mean its is honestly told as inspired by frank Miller 300. now we know that isnt a true to fact comic
secondly about dialouges and script ... its a genre of graphic novels they are treated differently from other comic adaptations... look at sincity it was also edgy and this too has the same edginess.
what was the challenege like again in sin city ..... that would the director would be able to do a comic books adaptation well or not.....
we all know how otherwise a comic book or novels adaptations are disaster... so for being a critic of 300 the movie... u ought to be well versed or critic of 300 the comic. now if u have issues with comic then dont carry that baggage when u write the review for a movie which is inspired by it....
its isnt about good or bad cinema .. just by script... its lot of elements to it ...... i have never seen a movie treated so beautifully..... a releam of animation n reality mixing so beautifully that some times am not sure whats what it seems so surreal ... its almost like a Pink Floyd or The Doors rock show where u just dont expect music but also the theaterics lights action along with it.....
but then... as u say he is sincere with his review.... and talk about conviction and sincerity ...... am sure ... 100% sure all the people writing feedback are also sincere when they are against him.... and are with the Spartans......
