I suggest thro' Anuji to Sony organisers of Indian Idol 3(if likely) that instead of leaving entire judgement to public of different categories , regions haging music sense and non music sense ( SOME not able to grasp BE-SUR , BE-THAL etc.);regionally biased etc.etc. it is better leaving 50% judgement to Public and 50@ to Judges. i.e. 50 marks by Public and 50 marks by Judges. Public marks can be counted as percentage to each contestant out of total public marks received ; Judges' marks can be by secret voting system of awarding marks to the contestants of each programme not to be blamed as prejudicial; This is the suggestion in the backdrop of counting the experience and expertise of the Judges who are supposed to be authorities in their field of music for giving clean judgement assessing all the parameters of the singers than the Public of different fields who can be good as audience but many of them may not be professionally better judges; --RAJAGOPAL--
