after reading the nazar review as well as this latest review of mr&mrs smith, as a reader one tends to feel that that the critic [though his reviews are quite catchy ]tends to rely too much on a spicy and wannabe 'funny n cool' style of writing and one may say he probably falls short where serious appraisal and hypothesis of a film is required.a critic is expected to also review the finer aspects of film making such as the editing , background scores, screenplay etc. and not just rely on a humorous, reader friendly style of writing.the crtic is definitely a good writer but where film appreciation is concerned i guess his lack of proper training is conspicuously evident .
