till the land is a naked display of Nazist thinking; like Hitler wanted to kill all children born with imperfections like autism etc., as they are a burden on society.
5. Arguments that the land cultivation is not generating enough wealth for societal good and hence be given away to Tata Motors at market prices is like sacrificing the basic principles that govern a civilised society based on democraticy at the altar of plutocracy.
Can the same people dare say when Tata Motors was in the red a few years ago, that since the company is in the red it should be wound up and its factory land be used for other purposes?
When they cant make that argument why forcing a poor farmer to sell his land at a rate predetermined by someone else?
Does someone dare Ratan Tata to learn farming by relinquishing managing Tata Motors when it was in the Red?
If you can not say that how can you tell the farmer to learn some other vocation instead of farming? If Ratan Tata can not learn farming how a deprived farmer can learn some other vocation, and why?
A farmer does not know any other vocation other than farming. The maximum compensation that you gave 4-8 lac per acre will be consumed in one fashior or other as he doesnot know how to make it as a capital and start a new vocation. If his capital is consumed what will he be left with after a few years?
Why a farmer be deprived of his holding on his invesment in his asset for a better price increase in future?
