I half heartedly agree with the "Poor is getting Poor" argument....The poor are better off than they were before, but their rate of growth is much lesser than the ambanis and in that sense they are relatively poorer... but why should you be against Mukesh Ambani building a 2B house...does he do it for free? does he get any tax benefits? Doesn't he hire guards/drivers etc to protect that mansion..Isn't it better for the economy if the Ambanis make more mansions than horde it in a investment fund...
