From what I understand the users report it, then the site takes it down it they see fit, but I'm open to corrected on this one.
But I'm disappointed that a fair percentage of people don't want to see the whole story and are deleted anyone who points that out.
Were the Australian cricket team good sports in this game? No not really. Did the break the rules? Except maybe by Hogg, no. That apart from a few missing facts about who heard the word monkey used. was my only point.
If the way the Australian cricket team played wasn't to a standard we feel acceptable, I'm all for changing the rules.
But the independent person in charge of the match felt Harbhajan did. How is that the Australian's fault or doing? For reporting something they feel unacceptable.
And just because the Australian cricket team are no angels, does that make Harbhajan innocent?
I feel it's a case were both are wrong, but one broke the rules, and the facts of that seem to be missing from most articles and comments.
