i find it preposterous of the notion that bhajji should not be let away. okay, i'd say bhajji deserve what he got IF HE SAID that. in the absence of any conclusive proof, like the lehmann episode, why is bhajji crucified for no reason.
also ricky ponting should be penalised for 5 matches like the bangla cricketer for falsely claiming a catch, nevermind that it wasnt out. thing is ponting's ready to claim anything under the guise of uncertainty. so was the bangla cricketer any different ? was larke any different ? clarke was a liar too. besides both of them and also gilchrist - all of them knew what was happening, but when yu have an mpire nodding at everything... yu are only gleefully doing it. i dont mind taking ths debate to its logical end. bcci should call of the tour, its not a threat or a blackmail its about wrong being done to bhajji plain and simple, by a team full of liars (who can lie without blinking in front of tv AND abuse a journalist) and non-sportsmen
