Hi my nameless friend (or are u too scared to write your name?)
You say that Mr Proctor must have found something concrete to convict Harbhajan of that offence. But I have a small query.
When Ricky and Gilly "backed" their mate, but said that they didnt hear anything, then what was the value of their testimony in a fact finding enquiry?
And if one person, who has one of the longest of carrers in the world, and that too without any controvercies, says that he didnt hear anything of that sort, then why was his word taken over someone who is always covered in some controvercy or the other.
Here I would like to clear one thing, that I have no objections to Ricky or Symonds or Clark not walking or appealing for a catch which "others" thought they dropped. My objection is that if player of one team is called for showing dissent, then in the same series, when a player of the opposite team appeals for a catch, which was nowhere near the bat AND which he also grassed, reacts as if something obvious has not happened, and he still goes scot free.
So before you say anything else about Indian cricket team, check the facts about the officiating in tha games involving Australia.
