Perhaps if you correctly interpreted my logic we wouldn't have a misunderstanding!
1) I think I may have said it 20 times here, but as a lawyer, I agree that Harbhajan couldn't be found guilty based on the currently available evidence 2) I admire the way Symonds handled the first occurrence with Harbhajan - telling him privately it was deeply offensive, asking him not to repeat it. The Hogg situation should be handled the same way. Harbhajan perhaps wasn't to know, similarly Hogg wasn't to know. If Hogg says it again in Perth, throw the book at him. 3) I'm Indian
