dude...read the article properly first....mr.prem clearly states that the person with unblemished reputation is not 'harbi' but sachin tendulkar, wouldn't you agree to that? we all indians will! then secondly, rumours do generate, and the second point was merely based on it....if sachin did not send, it doesn't mean that 'harbi' is guilty...it simply means that BCCI was not acting upon sachin's request, and it had a mind of its own. SIMPLE! maybe you need to read the article thoroughly before writing, or maybe you also fall into the same league as that of the infamous 'BENSON & BUCKNOR's AUSSIES'
