You mean Ganguly is a liar, Mr. Panicker ! Isn't it ? According to you a man who has led Indian cricket for 5 years with reasonable success has lesser credibility than the one who is around for not more than two months. Here is a man who talks about mutual respect between him and the captain and then within 4 days goes on to write an email to the Board complaining about the captain's attitude, mental instability etc. Is he more credible than Ganguly ? If Ganguly has so many shortcomings then why did John Wright never complain about Ganguly ? How could he manage to work with Ganguly for so many years ? Forget about who is a liar or who is more credible, but one thing is for sure. Mr. Chappell is a liability rather than being of any help for Ganguly and Indian cricket and one more burden/problem for Ganguly to take care of.
