See, in my opinion Pathan has potential and in comparision to Sehwag he is far better option in batting...Pathan should replaced in place of Sehwag as a pure Batsman bcz his batting style is very good.....Dravid needs to play him through out the world cup as important member of the team.....what he is using to do here giving the support to Sehwag who is totally flop and have not any batting sence.....It is right that Pathan's bowling is not so effective in last few months but he is young and learning......and don't fo
RE:Why no one is including sreesanth?
by naveen nambiar on Mar 17, 2007 03:56 PM Permalink
yes sreesanth is promising, but not yet for the limited over version. It would be fair to offer him a playing 11 berth in this low-key encounter and have a test of his learning curve in west indian limited over conditions. But certainly Munaf looks to be more penentrative than sreesanth. We can look at sreesanth only if agarkar misses his form / rules himself out of uncertain injuries. so the bowling options are perfect for the day:- zaheer agarkar munaf irfan kumble
WILL BE THE BEST TEAM OF THIS WC. 1. Sourav Ganguly 2. Sachin Tendulkar 3. Rahul Dravid 4. Yuvraj Singh 5. Robin Uthappa 6. M.S. Dhoni 7. Irfan Pathan 8. Zaheer Khan 9. Munaf Patel 10. Harbhan Singh 11. Anil Kumble / Ajit Agarkar
India should go with Sehwag, since he is very talanted all rounder, every player will have a lean patch in his career, and sehwag is no exception. I stognly support his inclusion for WC team. Belive me he will definetly came up with a good show.
as per pithes in the Carribeans...it seems that spin is a better option than pace...so my team goes like with the batting order Sourav Robin Tendulkar Dravid Yuvraj Dhoni Pathan/ Agarkar Harbhajan Zaheer Munaf Kumble
