ITS SUCH IRRITATING N DISGUSTING 2 SEE NADAL SERVE....HE TAKES ADVANTAGE BY MAKING SO DELAY....PLZ ANY1 TELL ME Y THE HELL HE DOESNOT FIND A PERFECT INNERWEAR ??? EVERYTIME HE HAS 2 SQUEEZE IT B4 SERVING ??? N Y DOES HE KEEP LONG HAIR , EACH N EVERY SECOND HE HAS TO ADJUST B4 SERVING ??????
FINALLY , KING FEDERER IS THE GOD OF TENNIS...IF ANY1 CAN BE COMPARED , ITS ONLY ROD LAVER...
RE:FEDERER THE KING
by r subramani on Jul 07, 2008 11:18 PM Permalink
whats the hell with the Nadala's innerwear, Hai style got to do with tennis! U sick, insane ppl never ty to applaud a pereson's effort, when the gr8 Fedx itself is congratulating Rafa:)
Don't act as Hypocrytes, learn to praise the effprt.. God bless you!
RE:RE:FEDERER THE KING
by ravichandra on Jul 07, 2008 10:10 PM Permalink
hello federer played up to his best and even he losted ...... even nadel played up to his best thats why he won ,,,,,,,,,,,, so we see now as every hero (borge,andre,pete,etc..) they left game so now its rogers time to leave game slowly ...........................slowly.............. and nadel emgerge .........................................as superstar of tennies
I am from the generation who grew up watching Sampras hold his sway over Centre Court. I wasn't fortunate enough to watch the greats like Borg, McEnroe, Connors, Lendl.....at work.
Hence for me this was the BEST FINAL...!!! It was totally top-notch tennis. Nadal deserved to win yesterday.
BUT I do hope Federer comes back again..........as he said.
I am a tennis fan and I am sorry but its so difficult to enjoy watching Nadal.
- he does not have any grace in his play. - he appears on court like he fighting a war, a crude low level war, and not playing tennis.
And worst, he is unethical cheater - takes too much time to server, particularly on big points. (He got sevral warnings on the court in the final and when he was asked to server quickly by the umpire he lost the point to give a break point).
Not to mention Roger is a delight to watch in every aspect.
What Roger has gained for tennis Nadal will make sure to tennis loses.
RE:Problem for tennis - Nadal
by dinesh lalwani on Jul 07, 2008 09:51 PM Permalink
sorry to say but u dont deserve to b a tennis fan.look what a match v saw.beyond imagination.u need to hats off to nadal for a determined n deserving victory over the champ
RE:Problem for tennis - Nadal
by bango tango on Jul 07, 2008 09:56 PM Permalink
ITS SUCH IRRITATING N DISGUSTING 2 SEE NADAL SERVE....HE TAKES ADVANTAGE BY MAKING SO DELAY....PLZ ANY1 TELL ME Y THE HELL HE DOESNOT FIND A PERFECT INNERWEAR ??? EVERYTIME HE HAS 2 SQUEEZE IT B4 SERVING ???
RE:Problem for tennis - Nadal
by r subramani on Jul 07, 2008 11:23 PM Permalink
whats the hell with the Nadal's innerwear, Hair style got to do with tennis! U sick, insane ppl never ty to applaud a pereson's effort, when the gr8 Fedx itself is congratulating Rafa:)
Don't act as Hypocrytes, learn to praise the effort.. God bless you Get well soon!
RE:Problem for tennis - Nadal
by arpana cm on Jul 07, 2008 09:23 PM Permalink
if u r der for fed's ass go n bang him....wat canu ppl say oder dan criticizin the new champ...just njoy tennis...
RE:Problem for tennis - Nadal
by sachin ahuja on Jul 07, 2008 09:30 PM Permalink
I agree wuth u... Even Nada do not have much range of shots... it was Roger Bad's day ... but i am very sure this will made Roger to now pull up his socks.... and u r right it was Nadal's delibrate attempt to take to long time to serve.... even Lujibic compained also in his match .... it's really Pain to see Nadal Winning
I AM SORRY THIS WAS A GREAT MATCH BUT NOT THE BEST FINEAL. THERE HAVE BEEN BETTER FINALS THAN THIS. 1. BORG & MCCANROE I WHICH BORG LOST AND FAILED TO WIN 6TH TITLE. 2.LENDL VS BECKER WHCIH INSPIET OF BEING 2 SETS DOWN BECKET BEAT LENDL DENYING HIM HIS WIMBLEDON WHICH HE NEVER WON.
RE:NOT THE BEST FINAL
by Braveheart on Jul 07, 2008 09:13 PM Permalink
IF SACHIN would have been a tennis player....he could have won all the four Grandslam continously for atleast 15 years!!!
RE:NOT THE BEST FINAL
by Kumar Saxena on Jul 08, 2008 01:55 AM Permalink
But unlike cricket Tennis is not a Game played only by 8 or 9 countries??? lol...
RE:BEST MATCH
by Braveheart on Jul 07, 2008 09:12 PM Permalink
IF SACHIN would have been a tennis player....he could have won all the four Grandslam continously for atleast 15 years!!!
RE:IF SACHIN would have been a tennis player....
by Guest on Jul 07, 2008 09:08 PM Permalink
and probably india would have won a few more cricket matches as well...
Surely this one !!! Never ever have two players As good as Nadal and Federer, played in the same ERA !!! If you look back , there was a time when Sampras was on Top and really no-one to challenge him in Wimbledon. And Probably Aggasi, but the match was no so Gripping. Looking back further , the quality of the game was not so good as the ones we have today, So don't compare Bjorn Borg and other people with Nadal and Federer. This is the only RUNNING ERA which will be remembered for TWO champions to have played not just one. And really both of them are True champions. All of us agreed that Federer is One of the best Tennis Player of all times. And then Nadal Defeated him.So what match we must have had. 10 years from now it will be called as the era when Federer and Nadal played and not just only Fedrer or only Nadal.And looking at the match, the fact that none of the players made too many unforced errors , made sure that the game was at its pinnacle from both ends.Both played their best tennis. No One lost his nerve till the very end !! Invariably the best finals ever. Just imagine what we have in store in Wimbledon 2009 !!!
RE:Of Course
by jade on Jul 07, 2008 08:05 PM Permalink
Your words make you seem quite young if your recall goes only as far back as Sampras and Agassi. You have not seen the likes of Connors, Borg and McEnroe, Lendl play, let alone even heard of players such as Bill Tilden, Pancho Gonzalez, Ken Rosewall, John Newcombe, Rod Laver, Roy Emerson, etc. Please look up the page on Rod Laver on wikipedia as also the section there on Laver's place amongst the all-time great tennis players; it will offer you a deeper appreciation of many players over the decades as also where Sampras and Federer are said to stand amongst them. It is quite possible, though, that you will cling on to Federer and Nadal as they are the only two you really know something about !!! It is not to deny Federer and Nadal's pre-eminence in the current time but for all-time greats you have to look at a much-longer time span than just the last decade or so.
RE:Of Course
by PRAVEEN BABU on Jul 07, 2008 09:06 PM Permalink
one of the best matches in recent times. dont you think rain played spoiled sport? i am happy for that match and feel pity for the folks who was watching the cricket match and fot the Ferrari supporters. working up to the finals it had the makings of a dream final and the visibly upset champion committed a lot of unforced errors and let the challenger gain the title. i dnt want to compare it with Borg and McEnroe one or anything like that. now a days with the advancement of technology even the players tend to relax a bit especially with the challenge option. It went in to the wee hours of the night but I can surely say that i witnessed a classic final. Felt for Federer but it gets sort of boring if the champoins are not streched to the limits. Nadal worked up towards this and deserved this one i believe.
After seeing the game yesterday I could not help but think of the difference in levels of the top 2 and rest of the field. It is simply too huge!!! Nadal and Federer can swap positions between themselves for years before anyone can even think of dethroning either of them. Djokovic is there but one slam does not make a champ. Consistency and quality are the two hallmarks of a champion.
Samprass, Agassi & to some extent Federrer all played risk free controlled game.They played only to win managing just do that.But not so great enertainers like Becker,Ivanisevic, Edberg.Though records don’t speak much for Ivanisevich but the entertainment vaule he provided was of high quality in bits which he could'nt compile and convert them to winning performaces and ended loosing to potentially lesser players like Aggasi & Samprass.
